I'm delighted to welcome Ben Kane back, on his virtual blog tour to promote his new novel, SPARTACUS THE GLADIATOR (St Martin's Press, hardcover, $26.99). Steven Pressfield calls Ben's latest book "Gritty, passionate and a damn good read. Brings Spartacus -and ancient Rome - to vivid, colorful life." I couldn't agree more. I'm currently reading it and am enthralled by Ben's keen sense of the violence and splendor of the era, as well as his sensitive, unique approach to this legendary man. Today, Ben offers us a guest post on the history behind his work. Please join me in giving a warm welcome to Ben Kane!
Spartacus ― the man, and the history
behind the fiction
There
are few names in history as recognizable as that of Spartacus. At first glance,
this may seem unsurprising. Spartacus’ achievements were truly remarkable.
Having been sold into slavery ― we are told by one ancient writer that he
deserted from the Roman auxiliaries, but by another that he was innocent of any
crime ― he escaped with some seventy others from a gladiator school in Capua,
Italy. Through a combination of ingenuity and pure luck, the motley group put
to flight not only the first Roman force sent against them, but also the
second. Neither set of soldiers were not the Republic’s crack troops, but the
second unit outnumbered the gladiators by more than forty to one. Unassailable
odds, one would have thought, yet the gladiators prevailed.
Word
spread fast. Slaves began running away from their masters to join Spartacus’
band. Soon he had a force of over ten thousand men; within a year, it was
quadruple that number, or if some of the sources are to be believed, more than
ten times. The gladiators’ breakout had become a full-scale rebellion that saw
much of southern Italy laid waste. It sent shockwaves through the corridors of
power, and in the two years that followed, Spartacus and his army won at least
nine major victories over Roman legions. Ultimately, however, he was defeated.
How
is it, then, that for thirteen hundred years after the fall of Rome, he was
forgotten? It wasn’t until the 1760s that Spartacus’ memory was resurrected ―
in France. This was due to the movement for political freedom that was sweeping
Europe, and the frequent slave uprisings that were taking place in the European
powers’ overseas colonies. Spartacus’ renown spread far and wide once more. His
name was taken up by revolutionaries all over the world. Karl Marx thought of
him as a hero. Lenin, and later Stalin, used Spartacus as the ultimate icon of
the class struggle, as the model whom the proletariat should emulate. Howard
Fast, American author of the bestselling novel, was a Communist who used
Spartacus’ struggle in a similar manner. But his appeal was not just to
left-wingers. Spartacus crossed the political divide in the 1980s, when Ronald
Reagan mentioned him as a symbol of the fight for freedom.
So
what were the causes of Spartacus’ slide into obscurity after his death? The
fact that not a single written word survives from the man himself, or from any
of his followers, has to be a major reason. Another is that little over four
thousand words survive that mention him – that’s about ten pages of a typical
novel. More was written about Spartacus, but sadly it did not survive. Thirdly,
Roman scholars chose not to comment too much on this dark chapter in their
history. It’s a common feature for great powers to brush the details of their
military defeats under the carpet. Human beings prefer to dwell on the glories,
the heyday and the wars won. As the saying goes, the victor takes the spoils ―
and they also get to write the history.
Was
Spartacus really the man we think of today? First, let’s take a look at the
world in which he lived. By the first century BC, Rome had conquered all of its
potential enemies in the Mediterranean. Its conquests provided a huge influx of
wealth into the Republic. At the same time, agriculture was changing, becoming
larger-scale. The result was an enormous demand for labour, a need that was
satisfied by the import of hundreds of thousands of slaves to Italy. They
provided the workforces for the latifundia, or estates that covered much of the
countryside.
The
human tide of slaves that came from the eastern Mediterranean, from north of
the Rhine and Danube rivers, and from the areas beyond the Black Sea. Thrace
(roughly, modern-day Bulgaria) was one of the crossroads for this trade, and
its people were also subject to enslavement. Other slaves came from northern
Europe, from the regions east of the Rhine, and from Gaul. The influx of a huge
number of free-born slaves into Italy over a short time had a dramatic effect.
One of the least welcome was slave rebellions. Spartacus’ uprising was not the
first, but the third, slave war to rock Rome in a turbulent period of only
sixty years. The first two took place on Sicily, the first from 135-132 BC, and
the second from 104-100 BC. It is ironic that these rebellions, both of which
lasted longer than that of Spartacus, have all but been forgotten ― despite
being better documented. What’s clear about the first two uprisings is that
they were not about ending slavery. Nor was that of Spartacus. What they were
about was men and woman, many of whom had been freeborn, seeking to escape
their enslavement.
Today,
there are few better symbols of the small man’s fight against overwhelming
tyranny or brutal oppression than Spartacus. Much of what we think about the
man comes from films, TV shows, or novels. Many modern-day portrayals depict
Spartacus as a warrior in the fight against evil, even someone who wanted to
free all slaves. As I’ve mentioned, the real situation was very different to
these depictions. It is all too easy ― yet erroneous ― to place modern
sensibilities on people who lived two thousand years ago. Yet life and morals
then were totally different. Slaves were part of everyday life. Like washing
machines or automobiles, everyone who could afford one, had one. Wealthy slaves
had their own slaves. Freeing a favoured slave was common enough, but the idea
of ending the practice of slavery would have seemed bizarre to the vast
majority. Spartacus was a talented and courageous man, a charismatic and canny
general. He worked to his strengths and was adept at exploiting Rome’s
weaknesses.
But
he was not a man whose burning desire was to free all slaves.
Thank you, Ben! To find out more about Ben and his work, please visit his website.